Cardiac mass evaluation with cardiac computed tomography: A review.

Cardiac masses are rare and include both benign and malignant neoplasms as well as pseudo-tumors. The goal of imaging in patients with suspected cardiac mass is to: (1) confirm presence of a mass; (2) determine the mass' location in the heart; (3) characterize the mass to determine if it is benign or malignant; and (4) evaluate its relationship and effect on adjacent structures. Echocardiography is often the first to detect and assess cardiac structures as it is widely available, non-invasive, and can be done bedside. Echo can also determine if the myocardium or pericardium is involved. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is often the second modality of choice to evaluate a cardiac mass. Cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT) is an excellent alternative modality with high spatial and temporal resolution, which is widely available, fast, and can be performed in patients with cardiac hardware. We will discuss the role of computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of various cardiac masses.

Review of pericardial disease on computed tomography.

Echocardiography has long been the mainstay in the evaluation of cardiac and pericardial disease. As computed tomography (CT) has advanced, it has become a valuable partner in the imaging of the pericardium. The advantages of CT include a larger field of view, multiplanar reconstruction and increased discrimination between various soft tissues and fluids. CT is less operator dependent and can more easily, and reproducibly, image areas of the pericardium for which echocardiography has poor windows such as the right pericardium. The introduction of EKG gating has decreased cardiac motion artifact and can allow functional evaluation although echocardiography remains the primary source of real-time imaging of cardiac and valve motion. It is essential for the skilled cardiac imager to understand the strengths and weaknesses of CT and its role in the definition and assessment of pericardial disease.

Centrilobular emphysema and coronary artery calcification: mediation analysis in the SPIROMICS cohort.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with a two-to-five fold increase in the risk of coronary artery disease independent of shared risk factors. This association is hypothesized to be mediated by systemic inflammation but this link has not been established. METHODS: We included 300 participants enrolled in the SPIROMICS cohort, 75 each of lifetime non-smokers, smokers without airflow obstruction, mild-moderate COPD, and severe-very severe COPD. We quantified emphysema and airway disease on computed tomography, characterized visual emphysema subtypes (centrilobular and paraseptal) and airway disease, and used the Weston visual score to quantify coronary artery calcification (CAC). We used the Sobel test to determine whether markers of systemic inflammation mediated a link between spirometric and radiographic features of COPD and CAC. RESULTS: FEV1/FVC but not quantitative emphysema or airway wall thickening was associated with CAC (p = 0.036), after adjustment for demographics, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, statin use, and CT scanner type. To explain this discordance, we examined visual subtypes of emphysema and airway disease, and found that centrilobular emphysema but not paraseptal emphysema or bronchial thickening was independently associated with CAC (p = 0.019). MMP3, VCAM1, CXCL5 and CXCL9 mediated 8, 8, 7 and 16% of the association between FEV1/FVC and CAC, respectively. Similar biomarkers partially mediated the association between centrilobular emphysema and CAC. CONCLUSIONS: The association between airflow obstruction and coronary calcification is driven primarily by the centrilobular subtype of emphysema, and is linked through bioactive molecules implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier: NCT01969344 .

Paratracheal Paraseptal Emphysema and Expiratory Central Airway Collapse in Smokers.

RATIONALE: Expiratory central airway collapse is associated with respiratory morbidity independent of underlying lung disease. However, not all smokers develop expiratory central airway collapse, and the etiology of expiratory central airway collapse in adult smokers is unclear. Paraseptal emphysema in the paratracheal location, by untethering airway walls, may predispose smokers to developing expiratory central airway collapse. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether paratracheal paraseptal emphysema is associated with expiratory central airway collapse. METHODS: We analyzed paired inspiratory and expiratory computed tomography scans from participants enrolled in a multicenter study (Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) of smokers aged 45 to 80 years. Expiratory central airway collapse was defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction in cross-sectional area of the trachea during expiration. In a nested case-control design, participants with and without expiratory central airway collapse were included in a 1:2 fashion, and inspiratory scans were further analyzed using the Fleischner Society criteria for presence of centrilobular emphysema, paraseptal emphysema, airway wall thickening, and paratracheal paraseptal emphysema (maximal diameter ≥ 0.5 cm). RESULTS: A total of 1,320 patients were included, 440 with and 880 without expiratory central airway collapse. Those with expiratory central airway collapse were older, had higher body mass index, and were less likely to be men or current smokers. Paratracheal paraseptal emphysema was more frequent in those with expiratory central airway collapse than control subjects (16.6 vs. 11.8%; P = 0.016), and after adjustment for age, race, sex, body mass index, smoking pack-years, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, paratracheal paraseptal emphysema was independently associated with expiratory central airway collapse (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.98; P = 0.001). Furthermore, increasing size of paratracheal paraseptal emphysema (maximal diameter of at least 1 cm and 1.5 cm) was associated with greater odds of expiratory central airway collapse (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.25; P = 0.003 and 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.64; P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Paraseptal emphysema adjacent to the trachea is associated with expiratory central airway collapse. The identification of this risk factor on inspiratory scans should prompt further evaluation for expiratory central airway collapse. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 00608764).

Improved identification of sternal injuries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT): sagittal reconstructions.

Chest computed tomography is acquired in the axial plane, but sternal injuries may be missed on axial images. This study hypothesized that sagittal sternal reconstruction images improve detection of sternal injury and radiologist's confidence in diagnosis compared to axial images. Five radiologists independently reviewed first axial images and on a different day sagittal images of a retrospective set of trauma cases recording presence/absence of a sternal injury and/or adjacent hematoma. The reviewer's confidence in the presence/absence of a sternal injury was assessed on a 5-point scale. Sagittal reconstructions generally yielded higher interreader agreement and confidence indices on statistical analysis.

Association Between Expiratory Central Airway Collapse and Respiratory Outcomes Among Smokers.

IMPORTANCE: Central airway collapse greater than 50% of luminal area during exhalation (expiratory central airway collapse [ECAC]) is associated with cigarette smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, its prevalence and clinical significance are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ECAC is associated with respiratory morbidity in smokers independent of underlying lung disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of paired inspiratory-expiratory computed tomography images from a large multicenter study (COPDGene) of current and former smokers from 21 clinical centers across the United States. Participants were enrolled from January 2008 to June 2011 and followed up longitudinally until October 2014. Images were initially screened using a quantitative method to detect at least a 30% reduction in minor axis tracheal diameter from inspiration to end-expiration. From this sample of screen-positive scans, cross-sectional area of the trachea was measured manually at 3 predetermined levels (aortic arch, carina, and bronchus intermedius) to confirm ECAC (>50% reduction in cross-sectional area). EXPOSURES: Expiratory central airway collapse. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was baseline respiratory quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] scale 0 to 100; 100 represents worst health status; minimum clinically important difference [MCID], 4 units). Secondary outcomes were baseline measures of dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] scale 0 to 4; 4 represents worse dyspnea; MCID, 0.7 units), baseline 6-minute walk distance (MCID, 30 m), and exacerbation frequency (events per 100 person-years) on longitudinal follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 8820 participants with and without COPD (mean age, 59.7 [SD, 6.9] years; 4667 [56.7%] men; 4559 [51.7%] active smokers). The prevalence of ECAC was 5% (443 cases). Patients with ECAC compared with those without ECAC had worse SGRQ scores (30.9 vs 26.5 units; P < .001; absolute difference, 4.4 [95% CI, 2.2-6.6]) and mMRC scale scores (median, 2 [interquartile range [IQR], 0-3]) vs 1 [IQR, 0-3]; P < .001]), but no significant difference in 6-minute walk distance (399 vs 417 m; absolute difference, 18 m [95% CI, 6-30]; P = .30), after adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, forced expiratory volume in the first second, pack-years of smoking, and emphysema. On follow-up (median, 4.3 [IQR, 3.2-4.9] years), participants with ECAC had increased frequency of total exacerbations (58 vs 35 events per 100 person-years; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.29-1.72]; P < .001) and severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization (17 vs 10 events per 100 person-years; IRR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.51-2.21]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a cross-sectional analysis of current and former smokers, the presence of ECAC was associated with worse respiratory quality of life. Further studies are needed to assess long-term associations with clinical outcomes.